That is pretty interesting. I wonder if there are some real life examples of that. -- Maybe like how we live life and create institutions and conduct ourselves as if are endowed with choice and live in a meaningful universe -- even though some scientists and thinkers believe that choice is an illusion and the universe lacks intrinsic meaning.

Are there any real life examples of society choosing a perspective we ALL agree is less accurate than another but that still gives us benefits in other ways? I have to think about that some more.

Usually, we tend to promote the view that we believe is the most accurate, and that gives us the most benefit, usually because we orient ourselves to what we believe (or we orient the world to what we believe which I think is actually more so the case).

A materialist might privilege a mechanical, logical perspective; whereas an idealist might privilege the 'noetic' or the transcendental; or a romanticist passion and beauty.

But to add on to that, the objective world is also an interactive and malleable world. It is hard to say what is the more accurate view, which is why there are ongoing debates in philosophy (and science more generally). I believe that reality itself is in a dynamic relationship with Being, and both influence each other.